
During his recent Nobel acceptance speech, President Obama pointed out that at the crux of our catastrophic failure at achieving peace lies the divisive, fear-inciting force of religion, saying:
“People fear the loss of what they cherish about their particular identities — their race, their tribe, and perhaps most powerfully their religion. In some places, this fear has led to conflict. At times, it even feels like we are moving backwards. We see it in Middle East, as the conflict between Arabs and Jews seems to harden. We see it in nations that are torn asunder by tribal lines. Most dangerously, we see it in the way that religion is used to justify the murder of innocents by those who have distorted and defiled the great religion of Islam, and who attacked my country from Afghanistan. These extremists are not the first to kill in the name of God; the cruelties of the Crusades are amply recorded. But they remind us that no Holy War can ever be a just war. For if you truly believe that you are carrying out divine will, then there is no need for restraint — no need to spare the pregnant mother, or the medic, or even a person of one’s own faith. Such a warped view of religion is not just incompatible with the concept of peace, but the purpose of faith — for the one rule that lies at the heart of every major religion is that we do unto others as we would have them do unto us.”
Durante su reciente discurso al aceptar el premio Nóbel de Paz, el Presidente Obama señaló que al centro de nuestro catastrófico fracaso por alcanzar la paz está el divisivo y atemorizante poder de la religión, cuando dijo:
“Las personas temen la pérdida de lo que más aprecian acerca de su identidad particular – su raza, su tribu, y tal vez lo más importante, su religión. En algunos sitios, este temor ha llevado al conflicto. En ocasiones, hasta parece que vamos retrocediendo. Lo vemos en el Oriente Medio, donde el conflicto entre Arabes y Judíos parece solidificarse. Lo vemos en aquellos países que se desgarran por el conflicto entre las diversas tribus. Y más peligrosamente, lo vemos en la forma en que la religión es utilizada para justificar el asesinato de inocentes por aquellos que han desvirtuado y contaminado la gran religión del Islam, y que atacaron a mi país desde Afganistán. Estos extremistas no son los primeros en matar en nombre de Dios; las crueldades de las Cruzadas han sido ampliamente reportadas. Pero nos recuerdan que ninguna Guerra Santa podrá ser nunca una guerra justa. Porque si usted realmente cree que está llevando a cabo la voluntad divina, entonces no hay necesidad de ejercer moderación – no hay razón para perdonar a la madre encinta, ni al médico, ni a una persona de su misma fe. Tan torcida visión de la religión no es solamente incompatible con el concepto de paz, sino con el propósito de la fe – porque la regla que existe en el centro de cada una de las principales religiones es que tratemos a los demás como nos gustaría ser tratados.”
His words remind me of one of my favorite movie lines of all time, when Robert DeNiro tells Mickey Roarke in Angel Heart: “They say there’s just enough religion in the world to make men hate one another, but not enough to make them love.”
While America’s Constitution calls for a separation of church and state and we have no official religion, preventing us from ever becoming a theocracy like those we have often dealt with in the Middle East, it is no secret we are largely a Christian nation. As Christians, should we not look to the teachings of Jesus Christ for guidance on our approach to attaining peace? After all he is often referred to as the “Prince of Peace.”
This is the first time I quote scripture, but as long as we’re on the subject of how religion drives conflict, why not? According to the New Testament, Jesus Christ once said during his Sermon on the Plain:
“Love your enemies, do good to those who hate you, bless those who curse you, pray for those who mistreat you. If someone strikes you on one cheek, turn to him the other also. If someone takes your cloak, do not stop him from taking your tunic. Give to everyone who asks you, and if anyone takes what belongs to you, do not demand it back. Do to others as you would have them do to you.”
—Luke 6:27-31. NIV
So that’s what Obama was talking about. Yet, that’s not what America has ever done. After the towers fell in New York City on September 11th, we made a choice. Peace was not the choice. Perhaps only one of our cheeks is bloody, or perhaps rather than let another strike the flipside of our face, we chose to gouge it out ourselves. And when the President spoke at West Point recently to announce our expansion of the war in Afghanistan, again, peace was not the choice.
The Presidents’ Nobel speech closed with: “We can understand that there will be war, and still strive for peace. We can do that — for that is the story of human progress; that is the hope of all the world; and at this moment of challenge, that must be our work here on Earth.”
Frankly, as war rages on in the regions where it always had, between Christians and Muslims and Jews as it has for over two thousand years, I’m not sold on our progress when it comes to peace. I believe that it is a story yet to be told. But I do agree that it is our challenge and that at some point we must stop “striving” and start “doing.”
Why do we even pretend or attempt to seek out peace if it seems so hard to reach? Why bother, when we seem to love conflict and drama so much? When even our own president acknowledged upon receipt of the highest peace honor offered in our world that: “War, in one form or another, appeared with the first man. At the dawn of history, its morality was not questioned; it was simply a fact, like drought or disease — the manner in which tribes and then civilizations sought power and settled their differences.”
Perhaps, just like our spiritual instincts, it’s because something inside us tells us that while it’s not what we’re doing, it’s what we ought to be doing. Something intangible and invisible tells us that peace is good and that peace is better. Peace is safe and warm and happy. At times like these holidays, we often see, hear and even profess wishes of joy and peace to all. But do we mean it? We should.
Only by laying down our arms and seeking that common ground in our diverse faiths that Obama alluded to, will we ever achieve some semblance of peace on Earth. Only through tolerance, and each religion and its leaders desisting from convincing their flocks that theirs is the only path to enlightenment and the afterlife, might we attain mutual respect and empathy, supporting each other’s culturally unique pursuits of the divine rather than undermining those pursuits and descending into the hell of war.
Would it be worth it? Of course, it would. Peace on earth would free us to end suffering and elevate ourselves to a higher iteration of ourselves, an evolution. We could truly create a shared paradise here on this little planet, a preview of heaven. If only we could stop killing each other over religious differences and realize that what we agree upon is greater: that God wants humanity to live up to its potential and the only way to do it is to stop fighting and start working together.
After all, as my 5-year old son pointed out to me when he heard me discussing this topic: “God wants peace.”
Let’s start making it today.
The opinions expressed in this commentary are solely those of Rudy Ruiz.
Rudy Ruiz has been hailed as a cultural visionary. A published author and multicultural advocate, Ruiz is an acclaimed multicultural communications entrepreneur. He founded Red, Brown and Blue as well as Interlex, one of the nation’s leading advocacy marketing agencies ranked by Ad Age as one of the Top US Agencies across all disciplines. Prior to that, Ruiz earned his BA in Government at Harvard College and his Masters in Public Policy at the Harvard Kennedy School.
Sus palabras me recuerdan una de mis frases favoritas de una película, cuando Robert DeNiro le dice a Mickey Roarke en El corazón del ángel: “Dicen que hay justamente la suficiente religión en el mundo para lograr que los hombres se odien, pero no la suficiente para hacerlos amar.”
Mientras que la Constitución Americana pide la separación de la iglesia y el estado, y no tenemos una religión oficial, evitando así que pudiésemos convertirnos en una teocracia como las que hemos tenido que enfrentar frecuentemente en el Medio Oriente, no es ningún secreto que somos una nación predominantemente Cristiana. Y como Cristianos, no deberíamos dejar que las enseñanzas de Jesucristo nos guiaran en nuestro esfuerzo por alcanzar la paz? Después de todo, a El se le llama “Príncipe de Paz”.
Esta es la primera ocasión que cito las sagradas escrituras, pero ya que estamos hablando de la forma en que la religión impulsa el conflicto, porqué no hacerlo? De acuerdo al Nuevo Testamento, Jesucristo dijo una vez durante su Sermón en la Planicie:
“Amen a sus enemigos, hagan el bien a los que los odian, bendigan a los que los maldicen, rueguen por los que los maltratan. Al que te golpea en una mejilla, preséntale la otra. Al que te arrebata el manto, entrégale también el vestido. Da al que te pide, y al que te quita lo tuyo, no se lo reclames. Traten a los demás como quieren que ellos les traten a ustedes.” -Lucas 6:27-31.NIV

Así que esto es de lo que hablaba Obama. Pero esto no lo hecho jamás este país. Después que las torres cayeron en la ciudad de Nueva York el 11 de Septiembre, tomamos una decisión. La Paz no fue la decisión que tomamos. Quizás solo una de nuestras mejillas está sangrienta, o quizás antes que permitir que otro golpeara la mejilla opuesta, optamos por arrancarla nosotros mismos. Y cuando el Presidente habló en la academia de West Point recientemente para anunciar nuestra expansión de la guerra en Afganistán, tampoco fue la paz la opción escogida.
El discurso del Presidente al aceptar el premio Nóbel concluyó: “Podemos entender que habrá guerra, y aún así esforzarnos por alcanzar la paz. Podemos hacerlo – - porque tal es la historia del progreso humano; esa es la esperanza de todo el mundo; y en este momento de reto, esa debe ser nuestra labor aquí en la Tierra.”
Francamente, a medida que la guerra ruge en las regiones donde lo ha hecho siempre, durante más de dos mil años, entre Cristianos y Musulmanes y Judíos, yo no creo que hayamos hecho algún progreso en cuanto a la paz. Yo creo que esa es una historia aún por escribirse. Pero sí estoy de acuerdo en que es nuestro reto y que en algún momento deberemos dejar de “intentar” y empezar a “realizar”.
Porqué pretendemos o intentamos buscar la paz si parece tan difícil de alcanzar? Para qué molestarnos, cuando parecemos amar tanto el conflicto y el drama? Si nuestro propio presidente, al aceptar el honor más grande de paz que se ofrece en el mundo reconoció que: “La guerra, de una u otra forma, apareció con el primer hombre. En el amanecer de la historia, no se cuestionaba su moral; simplemente se aceptaba como un hecho, como la enfermedad o la sequía –era la forma en que las tribus y después las civilizaciones buscaban el poder y arreglaban sus disputas.”
Quizas, al igual que nuestros instintos espirituales, es porque algo dentro de nosotros mismos nos dice que si no es lo que estamos haciendo, es lo que deberíamos estar haciendo. Algo intangible e invisible nos dice que la paz es buena, que la paz es mejor. La paz es segura, y cálida y feliz. En esta temporada de fiestas, con frecuencia vemos, escuchamos y hasta profesamos deseos de gozo y paz para todos. Pero es ésa realmente nuestra intención? Debería serlo.
Solo deponiendo nuestras armas y buscando el terreno común en nuestras diversas religiones, al que Obama hizo referencia, podremos alcanzar una semblanza de paz en la Tierra. Solamente a través de la tolerancia, y cada religión y sus líderes desistiendo de convencer a sus rebaños que el suyo es el único camino a la iluminación y la vida eterna, podremos lograr empatía y respeto mutuo, apoyando los esfuerzos singulares de la cultura de cada uno en la búsqueda de lo divino, en vez de socavar esos esfuerzos y descender al infierno de la guerra.
Valdría la pena? Por supuesto que valdría la pena. La paz en la tierra nos liberaría para poner fin al sufrimiento y elevarnos a una iteración mas elevada de nosotros mismos, a una evolución. En realidad podríamos crear un paraíso compartido aquí en este pequeño planeta, un avance del cielo. Si tan solo pudiésemos dejar de matarnos por diferencias religiosas y comprender que es más aquello en que estamos de acuerdo; que Dios quiere que la humanidad desarrolle su máximo potencial y la única forma de lograrlo es dejar de pelear y empezar a trabajar juntos.
Después de todo, como me explicó mi hijo de cinco años cuando me escuchó discutiendo este tema: “Dios quiere paz”.
Empecemos hoy a hacer la paz.
Rudy Ruiz es conocido como un visionario cultural. Autor y campeón de los derechos de comunidades multiculturales, Ruiz es un destacado empresario de comunicaciones. Fundó Red, Brown and Blue e Interlex, una de las agencias de mercadeo social más reconocidas en la nación, proclamada por Ad Age como una de las agencias de publicidad más importantes en el pais. Anteriormente, Ruiz se graduó de Harvard College y obtuvo su maestría en Administración Pública en el Harvard Kennedy School.
December 16th, 2009 at 7:07 am
Every major religion preaches peace towards your fellow man. The problem lies with the individual. If you have not experienced peace or joy in your heart you’re less likely to extend kindness to strangers or your neighbors. Most of the world’s dictators are empty inside -devoid of kindness and peace. They in turn allow the citizens in their countries to suffer. As far as President Obama goes with his speech about peace -he still has alot of work cut out for himself. Why is the United States even involved with these wars? We need to take care of our people in this country and make sure that intelligence prevents another September 11th disaster. We should withdraw from all wars and concentrate on the social ills attacking this nation. I am still in shock that Pres. Obama won the Nobel Peace prize. He does not deserve it. That award holds no meaning anymore, to me.
December 16th, 2009 at 7:55 am
Mr. Ruiz.
Thank you for your editorial. Well written, thoughtful, compelling. I truly wish I could agree with you.
You work references to President Obama’s Oslo speech into your logic well, but other sections of his speech present 2 premises that, if accepted, lead to a conclusion that contradicts the primary thrust of your essay – “Only by laying down our arms and seeking that common ground in our diverse faiths that Obama alluded to, will we ever achieve some semblance of peace on Earth.”
First, “For make no mistake: evil does exist in the world. A non-violent movement could not have halted Hitler’s armies.”. I accept the fact that evil exists in this world. Hard to deny. Much, but not all, of this evil is based on a distorted view of a particular religion (Not singling out Islam here. Radical Islamic fundamentalists hold no monopoly on misuse and distortion of religious tenets.).
Second, “Terrorism has long been a tactic [of war], but modern technology allows a few small men with outsized rage to murder innocents on a horrific scale.”. Again, it is hard to deny the validity of this premise.
Given these 2 assertions, a logical conclusion would be that to lay down one’s arms, to fail to respond to such a horrific wrong as that of 9/11 would only invite further atrocities. More loss of life.
Self preservation is built into us at the genetic level. This drive can, and has been over-ridden countless times, for both good and evil. We see it all the time. Man drowns trying to rescue child. Man badly burned while pulling victim from burning vehicle. Suicide bomber kills 20 in Baghdad produce market.
But it is difficult to over-ride this drive of self preservation when the scale is that of nations. We must protect ourselves.
To paraphrase a very eloquent statement put forth by President Obama’s administration, if we could be certain that all of those who hate our nation would unclench their fist when we extend an open hand, then I could agree with you without reservation. Think of the peace dividend. Not only in the matter of our national wealth, but more importantly in the precious blood spilled by all involved. I simply do not see a path to that end. Perhaps someday, but most likely not within our lifetimes.
Keep up the most excellent work, Good Sir.
Best Regards, and a joyous Christmas Holiday to you and yours. Loyd Cook